Discipline and Tribunal Hearings

Agreed Statements of Fact and Joint Submissions on Penalty

Many discipline matters end without a contested hearing. The regulator and the professional agree on the facts and propose a penalty together.

  • Topic Discipline and Tribunal Hearings
  • Sources checked November 10, 2026
Draft for legal review. This page has not yet been reviewed by Ryan J. Manilla.

Key Takeaways

  • An agreed statement of facts replaces witness evidence on the agreed points.
  • A joint submission proposes a penalty both sides support.
  • Panels decide whether to accept a joint submission.
  • Agreed facts become public. CCO posts accepted joint submissions on its register.

How It Works

The parties negotiate the facts the panel will rely on, and usually a proposed penalty. The panel hears submissions and decides whether to accept. CCO, for example, posts joint submissions on the public register once accepted by a panel. OMVIC describes settling discipline referrals through an agreed statement of facts and penalty.

What to Weigh

  • Every admission becomes part of the public record.
  • Admissions may affect civil or criminal proceedings.
  • Compare the likely contested outcome with the proposed penalty.
  • Confirm costs terms.

Frequently Asked Questions

Must the panel accept a joint submission?

Panels are not strictly bound, but they generally give joint submissions significant weight.

Can I withdraw after signing?

That is very difficult once it is filed. Negotiate carefully before signing.

Sources

Statutory references are to the provisions listed below, as consolidated on e-Laws when this page was prepared.

  1. CCO, “The Discipline Process” — Checked November 10, 2026.
  2. OMVIC, “Notice of referral to discipline (NORD)” — Checked November 10, 2026.

Keep Learning About Your Proceeding

Read how Ontario regulatory proceedings typically unfold, or compare how other regulators handle complaints, hearings and appeals.